Home > Vintages and Regions > Bordeaux > Bordeaux 2008 > The Médoc, Part 2
Bordeaux 2008: The Médoc, Part 2
Bordeaux 2008
En primeur
The Médoc, Part 2
Tasting the wines of St Estèphe, Pauillac and St Julien was more than enough for one day, and so it was two days later - having spent the intervening time in St Emilion and Pomerol - that I moved onto Margaux. Starting with Margaux itself, we tasted the 2008 grand vin, Pavillon Rouge and Pavillon Blanc in the company of Paul Pontallier, who talked us through 2008. Admitting that this wasn't a great vintage, Pontallier was nevertheless naturally very positive, describing the wines as either very good or excellent. The vintage here started on September 22nd with the first selection of Sauvignon Blanc, destined for Pavillon, and picking continued sporadically during the ensuing week, with a several passes through the vines, finishing by the first week of October. By this time the Indian summer was well underway, and the harvesting of the Merlot began on October 6th, followed by the Cabernets, the only concern being a little light rain early on. It was all finished by October 20th, with the Petit Verdot being the last fruit to be brought in. The overall yield here was low, as elsewhere, as low as 25 hl/ha for the white grapes, and selection was strict, with just 36% going into the grand vin, 47% for the second, and 17% of the crop sold off. It all illustrates quite nicely the characteristics of the vintage, the associated difficulties, and the commitment required to make good wines under such conditions. It was unfortunate then that, although a lovely wine with a fine future ahead of it, Margaux lagged behind her first growth peers in this vintage. It was the first sign that the Margaux appellation had not fared so well in this difficult year.

That feeling continued with our next appointment at Prieuré-Lichine, which was hosting the UGC Margaux tasting this year. There were one or two good wines, but there were many that were much less exciting. There was dull, feral, farmyardy fruit in places, and some wines lacked vigour, precision or definition. Some estates that usually turn out something to please my palate were disappointing, whereas others that seem to perennially flop actually pulled out the stops and showed a fresh, clean and bright-fruited wine worthy of anyone's attention. In short, the wines were all over the place in terms of style and quality. And so it was with little hope that I arrived at that British favourite, Palmer. But I need not have feared; the wine here was excellent, Alter Ego (tasted first) put just about every cru classé just tasted to shame, and in the grand vin Bernard de Laage, who led the tasting, has produced a contender for wine of the appellation in this vintage.
Following my Margaux notes I present those from the Médoc and Haut-Médoc appellations, many having been shown at a tasting hosted by Chasse-Spleen (which was looking resplendent with its pink shutters, and so I regretted having left my camera in the car), others picked up along the way, including Sociando-Mallet (at the estate), Goulée (at Cos d'Estournel), Bernadotte (at Pichon-Lalande), Potensac (at Léoville-Las-Cases) and so on. In all honesty, as with Margaux there were many acceptable wines here, although none really excited my palate. (14/4/09)
Margaux, Médoc & Haut-Médoc 2008: Tasting Notes
Tasted in Bordeaux in April 2009. Click
to locate stockists.
Chateau Brane-Cantenac 2008:
Quite an interesting nose here, sweet and sherbetty, with crunchy,
violet-tinged, aromatic fruit. Stony, rich, juicy palate, with similar fruit
characteristics as found on the nose. This has a lean but still attractive style, with
nicely refreshing acidity. 15-16+/20
![]()
Chateau Dauzac 2008: Rather dark fruit character here, with sweet
black cherry, in a dense, confit style. An appealing start on the palate,
rich and creamy cigar-tinged blackberry fruit, with quite fine tannins, but
softer acidity. Overall this is pretty, but rather flash and lacking in
structure and substance. 14.5-15.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Desmirail 2008: Dark and brawny fruit on the nose here, with a
confit raspberry edge. Cleaner on the palate though, rather showy,
although there is a leaner, middleweight midpalate. Appropriate tannins and
certainly fresh, this has a nice style, but it lacks precision. 15-16+/20
![]()
Chateau Durfort-Vivens 2008:
Rather brighter fruit on the nose than some, with a pure and dense cherry
fruit....with just a hint of animal. Purity returns on the palate, with a plum
skin and cherry stone character, and a minerally, polished, elegant midpalate.
Persistent, ripe, attractive, with a little length. One of the better wines for
sure. 16.5-17.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Ferrière 2008: Not
very expressive on the nose, although what it does show has a good black cherry
and cream character. The palate has fine substance, with a slightly leaner
midpalate, stony fruit and light tannic structure. Firm acids. This lacks a
little weight, and yet has a slightly chewy element to it. It needs to put on
some fat in barrel, and could be good if it does so. 15.5-16.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Giscours 2008: Dark,
slightly withdrawn fruit here. The palate is crisp, fresh and stony, with a
slightly chewy extraction of tannins. Moderate texture, good acid, giving this a
fresh and defined style. There is a long, juicy finish and certainly some
vigour. This could be good given appropriate time. 15.5-16.5+/20
![]()
Chateau d'Issan 2008: This is 62% Cabernet Sauvignon, 38% Merlot, accounts
for 64% of the harvest, and will see 50% new oak. Picking began on October
1st, although most of the fruit for the grand vin was brought in between October
14th and 18th. Overall yield was just 28 hl/ha (for comparison, in 2007 it was
49 hl/ha). This has a much darker character than
Blason, with aromas of roasted meats, nutty oak and smoky complexity. The palate
is attractive and quite serious, with nice density, rich and ripe fruit, and
good spice. Nice backbone, good length too. A good showing. 16.5-17.5+/20
![]()
Blason d'Issan 2008: The second wine of
Issan.
This is 60% Cabernet Sauvignon, 40% Merlot, represents 36% of the harvest, and
will see 35% new oak. The volume is up this year as 10 hectares of Issan
vineyards with the Haut-Médoc appellation have been reclassified in October
2007 as AC Margaux, and the fruit has been included here. The nose is crisp,
with black fruits, perfumed liquorice and a little sweetness. Lean and stony on
the palate, although there is a sweet character to the fruit. Stylish in the
middle, but harder on the finish. Fresh, well judged, with some substance and
appealing notes of vanilla and raspberry. A good second wine. 15-16+/20
![]()
Chateau Kirwan 2008: A nose of
sweet cherry liqueur here, aromatic and pure. A fresh and creamy extract on the
palate, firm, with chewy tannins and moderate acidity. It seems well delineated
with freshness but perhaps not the vigour. At least it has good fruit. If this
comes together in bottle it may be worthwhile. It does seem to have moved away
from the heavily extracted style of the 2007, which is good. 15.5-16.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Lascombes 2008:
Dense, rather feral fruit, with some confit cherry character. The palate
starts off sweet and then quickly seems to dry out, becoming dominated by
extract and tannin. There is huge tannic structure here, with a soft layer of
muted fruit on top. Rather brawny in style, heavily extracted, lacking in the
texture or substance to match I feel. I'm dubious about this one. 15-16+?/20
![]()
Chateau Malescot St-Exupéry 2008: Dense and withdrawn, with a slightly
crunchy edge to the black fruits. Cool and creamy on entry, with roasted cherry
character. There is a juiciness here, but also slightly chewy tannins and a
sweet, confected edge. Nevertheless, this has good texture and a little length. There is
a hint of promise here. 15-16+/20
![]()
Chateau Margaux 2008:
This year the grand vin accounts for 36% of the harvest, slightly more
than in 2007, and is 87%
Cabernet Sauvignon, 10% Merlot, 1.5% Cabernet Franc and 1.5% Petit Verdot. A richer character then
Pavillon Rouge (tasted first) on the nose. Broader, more generous, with a little
perfume and gravel. Gentle but nicely defined on entry, but then it shows more
austerity, with a firm grip building in the middle. The texture is rather
subtle, overall elegant, but underneath a rather firm character. There is violet
and redcurrant perfume, with a pure and lifted style. Good length, but in this
vintage the quality lags behind Lafite, Latour and Haut-Brion. Certainly a good
wine though. 17.5-18.5+/20
![]()
Pavillon Rouge du Chateau Margaux 2008: The second wine of
Margaux,
accounting for 47% of the crop, this is 68% Cabernet
Sauvignon, 26% Merlot, 5% Petit Verdot and 1% Cabernet Franc. This is less
Merlot than usual. The nose has attractive, smoky, gravelly, gently perfumed
fruit. Pure and cool in character, with a firm midpalate structure. There is a
slightly biting character to the tannins, giving an austere and dry structure.
It gently builds in style on the palate, and will need time to show its best. 16-17+/20
![]()
Pavillon Blanc du Chateau Margaux 2008: As usual I have included the white wine of
Margaux,
which has the Bordeaux Blanc
appellation, here for simplicity's sake. The alcohol is 14% this year, down from
last year's 15.5%. A fabulous nose, both creamy and flinty. Fresh and defined on
the palate, rich, quite broad and textured, structured too. A lovely polished
style, tangible weight, with a moderately rich midpalate. There is great potential here. 17-18+/20
![]()
Chateau Marquis de Terme 2008:
An unusual nose here, meaty, farmyardy, a little herby, but there is also a
little cherry fruit. Sweetly textured, then confit, this is a softly
composed wine with moderate, ripe tannins and a firm punch of acid. Sweet and a
bit jammy though. 14.5-15.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Palmer 2008: The
harvest here began on October 1st and finished on the 17th, and the yield for
the estate was 30 hl/ha. As with 2007 Merlot dominates at 51%, with 41% Cabernet Sauvignon
and 8% Petit Verdot. This is dark, but fresh and crunchy, bright and perfumed.
The palate is dense, pure and vigorous, with a fine grippy substance and
moderate weight. A lovely, elegant wine but with substance, balance and
backbone. 17.5-18.5+/20
![]()
Alter Ego de Palmer 2008: Harvest and yield information for this, the
second wine of
Palmer, is as for the grand vin. A blend of 52% Merlot and 48%
Cabernet Sauvignon, this wine took 50% of the crop. On the nose a bright and
stony perfume, with crisp violets. Freshness follows on the palate, stony but
with substance, a touch juicy, but underneath it is structured and firmly
balanced. A very appealing wine which puts many classed growths of the
appellation to shame. 17-18+/20
![]()
Chateau Prieuré-Lichine 2008:
Not very expressive on the nose, slightly high-toned though, with some black
cherry notes. Polished style, but slightly lean, and then quite a bit of
midpalate tannin. Ripe, grainy, with good acidity. Softly composed, this - like
many wines here - is missing vigour and definition. 14.5-15.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Rauzan-Gassies 2008:
Hints of blackberry and cream here, in a chalky, mineral style. Cool on entry,
lighter and leaner in the midpalate when compared to Ségla, but more juicy in
terms of fruit. Nice tannins at the core, ripe, with good acidity. It lacks
great substance and definition, but the wines here do seem to be improving. 15-16+/20
![]()
Chateau Rauzan-Ségla 2008:
Rather muted, furry fruit on the nose, with a very firm substance and piles of
substance and tannin on the palate. Good firm acidity, plenty of dark fruit, a
decent body in the middle and freshness towards the finish. A decent length. A
good effort. 16.5-17.5+/20
![]()
Chateau du Tertre 2008:
Slightly brawny fruit character here, with cherry stone fruit. Rather earthy
too, farmyardy, hot and pruney. On the palate the tannins are nicely composed,
and there is a nice texture and, despite the fruit profile, attractively fresh
acidity. The structure of this wine is good, but will the aromatics come into
line? If they do this could be good, if not.....? 15.5-16.5+?/20
![]()
Goulée 2008: This wine, created first in 2003, is produced by the
team at Cos d'Estournel. I tasted that vintage at a dinner last year although did not write
the wine up for Winedoctor as the tasting conditions weren't really favourable.
The harvest here began on October 2nd, with an approximate yield of 20 hl/ha.
This is 80% Cabernet Sauvignon and 20% Merlot, matching the ratio in the
vineyard. Like Pagodes de Cos, tasted alongside, this has a very toasty nose,
with a concentrate ripeness of fruit. Dense, rich, creamy, very approachable,
with a good ripe substance. Nicely integrated, and it has freshness and vigour
too. Good wine. 16-17+/20
![]()
Chateau Potensac 2008: This
is certainly superior to Chapelle, which was tasted first. There are more
profound aromatics, with dark cherry and plum notes. More fleshy in the start,
with good substance, and a nicely balanced tannin core. Good character, body,
acid and integration. A nice effort for Potensac. 16-17+/20
![]()
Chapelle de Potensac 2008: The second wine of
Potensac.
Cherry fruit with a dark character on the nose. Nicely textured, quite a firm
backbone of tannin, with nice aromatic fruit like that on the nose. Approachable
although in a very firm style. Decent for what it is. 14.5-15.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Preuillac 2008:
There is open, expressive, rather firm and brawny fruit on the nose here. This
is followed by a moderate texture on entry, with firm midpalate structure, and
very firm acidity too. Grippy, with a forthright finish, this is a good effort
from this estate. 15.5-16.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Beaumont 2008: An
interesting nose, fresh and perfumed, although the fruit is dominated by notes
of rhubarb. It is more appealing than it sounds! Supple and perhaps slightly
oily on the palate, this is nicely textured, with sensible extract and backbone
of tannins. Good extract and firm grip. Overall rather straightforward, but at
least it is fresh. 15.5-16.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Belgrave 2008: Dark
and slightly plump fruit here, fresh although a little high-toned, sweet and
herby. Evident oak too. Very rounded style to the palate, some polished
substance, a touch of sweetness, but a little diffuse in the middle. Good
substance here though, and some nice extract and tannin. 15-16+/20
![]()
Chateau Bernadotte 2008: This is 56% Cabernet Sauvignon and 44%
Merlot, with an overall yield of 42 hl/ha. has warm and smoky fruit on the nose,
and a lovely textural quality on entry. Firm in the midpalate, with slightly
confected cherry fruit showing. The palate shows sweetness and texture, but
underneath there is a slightly sooty grip to the tannins which perhaps
contribute towards the slightly hard finish. Nice wine though. 15.5-16.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Camensac 2008:
Not so expressive on the nose, with just a little chalky red fruit poking
through. A good weight, with very bright red fruit on the palate, a little
high-toned and confected, herby too, although there is an attractive suppleness
to it. Lean to moderate texture, but with a little sweetness I find appealing,
and a nice finish. 15.5-16.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Cantemerle 2008:
Sweet black cherry and plum on the nose here, a very dark style of fruit, but
with freshness. Nice harmony on the palate, good substance but well judged, with
a tannic core and good acidity. There is a slightly bitter character to the
fruit, which is very firm with good substance. A good Cantemerle here I think.
16-17+/20
![]()
Chateau Chasse-Spleen 2008: A nice, very classic, rather cedary nose here,
with some polished but dusty (an oxymoron, I suppose) fruit on the palate.
Attractive, supple, with moderate weight and good fresh acidity, this has a
nice concentration of tannin and overall is nicely judged and harmonious. Very
good potential. 16-17+/20
![]()
Chateau Citran 2008: Not very
expressive, with just some dense and nutty fruit. A nice weight on the palate,
substantial in terms of body, with firm fruit backed up by firm tannins. There
is even a touch of cream here. But overall, a bit forceful, and rather strongly
extracted. 15-16+/20
![]()
Chateau La Lagune 2008:
Dense fruit, somewhat hard and withdrawn on the nose, with just a suggestion of
leafiness. The same character comes through on the palate for me, where the
fruit is dense, slightly meaty, slightly feral, with a rich, extracted, brawny
style. Very tannic, with a big grip and very firm acidity. It seems somewhat
over-worked to me. 15-16+?/20
![]()
Chateau Poujeaux 2008: Lovely bright fruit here, with a crystalline
black summer berry character. The palate has good freshness, with a crisp style,
and crunchy black fruits. There is even a little suppleness to it. Firm, tannic
backbone too, with good acidity. A nice style here. 16-17+/20
![]()
Chateau Sociando-Mallet
2008: Bright fruit here, fresh and with a little crunch too, with lots of
pure Cabernet character. Good substance. Crisp, stylish, with lots of spicy
extract. Substantial, moderately textured, with a fine acid core. There is a lot
of good potential here. 16.5-17.5+/20
![]()
Chateau La Tour Carnet 2008:
Very bright and confected fruit here, with aromas of cherries and pear drops,
with a sweet but dark character. Dense, delineated and rich, with high toned
notes on the palate. A very ripe and substantial wine, with lots of extracted,
grippy tannin and acid. 15.5-16.5+/20
![]()
