Home > Vintages and Regions > Rhône Tastings > Southern Rhône & Languedoc 1998
Southern Rhône & Languedoc 1998
What could entice a fan of the Southern Rhône more than a tasting of the 1998 vintage? Although we were not to know it at the time, 1998 was perhaps only the first in a sequence of hugely successful years for Châteauneuf du Pape and the surrounding appellations. After 1998 came the fresh and stylish wines of 1999, the rich and under-rated wines of 2000, and the wonderful 2001 vintage. Only the flooded vineyards of 2002 should temper our enthusiasm. But then the years that followed 2002 had warm summers and seemingly just as much to offer as those that had gone before. It would appear, on reviewing this information, that this is a golden era for the vineyards of the Southern Rhône; what better way to appreciate this than to look at the very year that began it all, the 1998 vintage?
This was a vintage feted seemingly by everybody with a pulse. The most renowned
critic of the Southern Rhône is surely Robert Parker, who described the
vintage as "sumptuous" referring in particular to Châteauneuf du Pape, suggesting
that one day it may become apparent that the vintage is superior to even 1989
and 1990. Others were similarly supportive of this opinion. Like many, I
purchased a few bottles, particularly of favourites such as
Beaucastel, but along the way
odd bottles from many other producers.
Despite my early awareness of the success of the vintage, a knowledge acquired in a solely vicarious manner without the opportunity to attend early tastings, I have not followed others' opinions since. I always try to come to tastings such as these unfettered by the views of others. I prefer to form my own opinions on the wines, rather than read or follow those of others. When reflecting on my notes I may then compare them with others; it is very instructive. You learn much about your own palate, the palates of others, and as a result even the wines seem to speak a little more clearly.
And so I came to this tasting carrying expectations based on inwardly digested opinions formed not quite ten years go. I was therefore surprised to find, in short, so many disappointing wines here. On tasting them, however, I understand the reasons clearly; it has crystallised my understanding of my own palate considerably. This was a great vintage in terms of climate, but it has engendered a certain style in many of the wines which will not appeal to all, and certainly not to me. The summer was hot and dry, and it was recognised at the time that in a number of regions the vines were placed under considerable stress as a result. Under drought conditions, the vine shuts down, arresting photosynthesis. In other regions, where the fruit continued to ripen, the skins thickened greatly, increasing the potential tannin and colour that may be extracted during vinification. Sugar concentrations rose, portending high alcohol in many of the wines, and in combination acidity may fall. Looking back at this basic synopsis of the vintage, I understand with great clarity why these wines taste the way they do today. There are some real monsters here. For someone who appreciates freshness, verve, vivacity and vigour, here - in some wines at least - is the exact antithesis of this style. Some wines are soupy and unfocussed. Some are simply over-ripe, showing flavours of baked fruit, volatile soy sauce, meat stock, balsamic vinegar and more. They are not attractive. Looking back, I am glad I did not have the financial wherewithal at the time to purchase these wines in quantity.
It is not, however, all sorrow and woe. There were a handful of good wines here. Wines from estates that are perhaps not renowned for producing the most concentrated cuvées which have done well, and some famous names which seemed to have coped well with the conditions, sometimes showing a touch of the warmth of the vintage, but within a frame of structure, of acidity. When the team got it right, whether that team be led by a Perrin, or a Brunier, or otherwise, the wines can be very, very good indeed, and they cry out for further time in the cellar. This is not a vintage entirely devoid of success, and indeed a few wines may even merit the high prices they command.
Although the focus here is undoubtedly Châteauneuf du Pape, this appellation accounting for twelve of the fourteen wines tasted, I start with lone representatives of the Coteaux du Languedoc and Gigondas appellations. (19/2/08)
Southern Rhône & Languedoc 1998 - Tasting Notes
Tasted in March 2008. Click
to locate
stockists:
Prieuré de St Jean de Bebian Coteaux du Languedoc 1998: The colour
here suggests a little maturity, but there is still a lot of deep red pigment to
be found, right out to the rather dusky rim. At first it shows some intense
fruit, blackcurrants with a sweet pastille edge, but then a more attractive
side, dense, solid and concentrated, blackberry fruit and wisps of smoke. The
texture is dense and creamy, yet quite cool and detached, backed up by a dense
extract. Through the midpalate more structure shows, with some ripe but dry
tannins. This is quite broad in style, and is very pleasing, although it
possesses a firm body and a dry
character that makes this a good food wine, despite the richness behind it.
Slightly tight tannins at the finish though; this is still on the way up. Very
good indeed. 17+/20
![]()
Domaine Santa Duc Gigondas Prestige des Hautes Garrigues 1998: A wine
with a fairly rich colour, showing some maturity with an orange-tinged rim. The
nose certainly has interest, although with a rather distinctive array of aromas.
We have cough candy sticks, Bovril, treacle toffee and most of all sweet, baked,
sticky fruit. There is a vegetal character as well, one which, curiously, is more
reminiscent of Pedro Ximénez than of Grenache. On the palate the same flavours
follow through. This is a rich and rounded wine, but with no point of focus. It
has a core of peppery tannins that seem to pervade inwards from the edges, but
what acidity there is is completely subsumed by the baked fruit and tannin. It
seems rather coarse and carries a rather obvious alcohol which influences the
texture greatly; and the label admits to 15%. The finish yields pepper and
spice, and little else. Overall, I find this disappointing. I am glad that this
is my only bottle. 13/20
![]()
Domaine des Sénéchaux Châteauneuf du Pape 1998: It is about six years since
I last had a bottle of this, and what a transformation over that time! This has
an attractive colour, vibrant and red, showing little of the dusky, brick-coloured
maturity that I expected. Nevertheless, it is more translucent than many other
wines tasted here. The nose is very typical of Grenache, showing some smoky, cherry fruit and
twiggy garrigue, with a touch of aniseed and liquorice, in a quite
intense, lifted manner. Pure, dense, quite concentrated on the palate, with a
really appealing extract and density, although it is not over the top. Ripe
tannins, mostly integrated, essentially this is just about ready and it is
certainly very enjoyable now, exceeding my expectations. Quite pure in style and
nicely balanced. It has a fresher style than many of its peers, and I find that very
appealing. 17/20
![]()
Domaine Font de Michelle Châteauneuf du Pape 1998: A good depth of
colour but showing a mature hue. Lots of depth and complexity here, with very
typical meaty, furry character with spiced fruits, orange peel and blueberries
peppered with cloves and cinnamon. A nice, rounded texture on the palate, spice
and pepper through the midpalate, still with a good current of tannins
underneath it all. Good grip here too. Smoky character. There is depth and
substance here but I don't find it to be overdone. Overall this is really rather
good and has a more appealing style than many wines of the vintage. 16.5/20
![]()
Lucien Barrot Châteauneuf du Pape 1998: A year and a half since I last
tasted this. Bottle number one was corked, so a replacement was produced. This
second bottle has a nicely mature hue, but isn't showing an awful lot on the
nose, just a little woody note, some Bovril and a weedy character. It has none
of the attractive garrigue I found last time. Firmly structured if not a
little too angular, with a dry tannic finish, although it is nicely textured.
Nice weight. Flavours of raspberry liqueur, a touch of alcohol and heat. I don't
think this is showing as well as the last bottle, and I think it may simply be
going downhill. A shameful disappointment. 13/20
![]()
Perrin Les Sinards Châteauneuf du Pape 1998: From the Perrin family of
Beaucastel
fame. A rich, dark,
concentrated hue, still carrying a very fine sediment despite some appropriate
decanting. On the nose it initially has a feral character, but later reveals
fleeting glimpses of ripe cherry fruit. It has a fine, defined quality to the
nose, rather like the aroma of glossy, polished cherry skins, perhaps rubbed
with black pepper and charcoal, rather than the scent of mere cherries alone.
The palate is gentle at first, but tightens up through the midpalate to show
lots of extract and some ripe, grainy tannins which give an appealing structure to the wine right
through to a slightly chewy finish. There is a balanced presence of fruit and a
well composed feel to it. To be critical it is rather soft behind the tannins,
and the acidity seems a little subdued and detached, a vintage effect I imagine, but I find it very
enjoyable nevertheless, and I think another year or two in bottle will bring
even more pleasure. 16.5+/20
![]()
Domaine de la Solitude Châteauneuf du Pape 1998: There is a very fine
sediment here, giving a slightly hazy appearance. The nose is warm, slightly
feral, with more than a touch of black pepper. A good weight on the palate, and
a well rounded, polished texture. It seems quite gentle through the midpalate
and then firms up, showing a lot of spicy body through to the finish, where
there is still quite some grip. It has a savoury, sappy style presented in a
full, slightly soft fashion with gritty Grenache fruit with a little brown sugar
sweetness to it also, which is a little disconcerting in a mature wine. Warming, cherry Grenache fruit liqueur. It all sounds a
little blowsy but there is some good, firm structure beneath it all and the
structure suggests there is
further potential here yet. It is merely a question of whether the flavours
appeal. 15+/20
![]()
Domaine Marcoux Châteauneuf du Pape 1998: A good colour, a fresh hue, but not so
dense as many of the other wines. Initially it is a little volatile, although
this soon goes to be replaced by a more meaty character, although it remains
rather high-toned throughout. Underneath is dense, roasted fruit. It does have a
slightly hot character though. Rich on entry, although it comes with a defining
frame that is more obvious than many of the wines tasted here. There is also a
lot of unresolved tannin, acidity and substance. In fact, there is a whole lot
of everything, and towards the end even the alcohol starts to poke out at the
edge. A bold, rather showy style despite its gentle appearance in the glass,
and it is showing the warmth of the vintage, like many other wines tasted here. 14/20
![]()
Roger Sabon Châteauneuf du Pape Cuvée Prestige 1998: A lovely,
enticing, glossy hue. An oxblood core, paling at the rim. The nose is beautiful,
showing roasted meats, quite lifted and direct, with a little cherry fruit poking through. It
is slightly high toned, and it is also showing a little orange peel and a savage,
wild, horsehair character. Surprisingly then it starts off quite pure and creamy
on the palate, although it broadens out and shows some muscle underneath it all
through the midpalate. It seems to become more wild and savage towards the
finish. This is very firm, a wine of real substance, but showing a good integration of
texture and structure through to the end. Still some potential here. This is an
impressive showing from this estate with which I am not really familiar.
Very good indeed. 17.5+/20
![]()
Bosquet des Papes Châteauneuf du Pape 1998: A mature hue, certainly
not as dense as that of the Chante le Merle, this estate's top cuvée, which
follows. An unusual
nose, showing a curious mixture of calcareous rock and seashells along with
a quite brawny, furry meat. Notes of mushrooms and also a raisined element which
is not entirely pleasing. The palate is initially quite direct, but then quickly
shows a lot of texture, a spicy, peppery tannic structure and a dry finish
which, although infused with tannin and tangible dry extract, seem strangely
unfocussed, losing its way on the finish. Nevertheless, although a brawny style,
there is some nice definition through the midpalate, and some good leathery
fruit over the grip and muscle. But on the whole it is a big bruiser of a wine,
with a little over-obvious alcohol, even though the label declares only 13.5%. But
it has some interesting flavours, alongside a
touch of heat on the finish. I find some good points here, but don't think the
style is really for me. 14/20
![]()
Bosquet des Papes Châteauneuf du Pape Chantemerle 1998: Of all the
bottles in my cellar from this vintage, this is the one that has perplexed me
most. Some previous bottles have been very brawny and volatile, sufficiently so
for me to find them undrinkable. Others have been passable if not good. How
would this bottle fare? In the glass it has a good deep colour, a mature hue but
nevertheless this wine is still holding onto a lot of red pigment too. The nose
is reassuring, showing lots of deep, spicy, meaty fruits although with a deep, raisined
character. There is certainly a resemblance, on this basis, with the basic
cuvée, and I think now, having tasted both together, I understand why I have
struggled with this wine. There are some
other complexities which demand further analysis, notes of intense, salty
Bovril and balsamic vinegar, although the palate actually seems more
harmonious than previous bottles. There is, surprisingly, quite firm acidity which helps, but
with this there is a meaty
texture, a sweet yet firm structure, and it is grippy and rich in extract and weight. It
finishes well. I think my problem with this unusual wine is its edge of raisined,
cough syrup fruit, which is a result of the hot vintage. I find it troubling, and
it matches nuances, such as soy
sauce, a medicinal character and especially the kick of alcohol that I have
previously noted in the wine. I do not like it so much. Will it just fall apart?
I am unsure; it
will be fascinating to taste again in the future. 14.5?/20
![]()
Domaine de la Janasse Châteauneuf du Pape Vieilles Vignes 1998: An attractive and
rich hue, showing a little maturity but still with a lot of depth and red
pigment at the core, leaving a fairly substantial coating of sediment in the
bottle. The nose is really full of interest, showing firstly the fur and animal
aspects that characterise the wines of the appellation, but then also aromas of sweet, roasted,
honey-coated meats, bacon and baked cherries, before coming round full circle to
a more savage, animal-skin character. There are also little notes of cream,
blueberry and vanilla. Lots of substance on the palate, creamy and yet also a
little brawny, as this wine is still carrying a lot of structure today. Good
richness through the midpalate, seamless and yet not showing lots of elegance
yet, the wine still has a lot of grip and stuffing to shed before we see that I
think. But it is wonderful to drink now, especially with suitable food.
Excellent, and certainly one of the better wines of the tasting. 18+/20
![]()
Domaine de Vieux Télégraphe Châteauneuf du Pape 1998:
This wine shows some maturity in the glass, but it still has plenty of deep red
pigment at its core. The nose has a fabulous depth, multilayered as it is, first
showing wisps of smoke, then an intensely concentrated seam of earthy fruit,
with a little note of roasted meat. Then nuances of orange peel and cloves make
a brief appearance. The palate has a delicious weight, with decent acidity, and
certainly there is a freshness to the palate, although it struggles, twisting
and turning with the ripe and hearty fruit. There is a lovely depth to the
fruit, although the style of the vintage does not allow it a fresh style. But it
has a very enticing grip, and a slightly bitter charcoal tinge to the structure.
It maintains a good presence in the mouth, and it has a good length. 18.5+/20
![]()
Chateau de Beaucastel Châteauneuf du Pape 1998: One of the few wines that I have subsequently acquired in
quantity, which I first tasted in an impressive mini-vertical, also taking in
the 1999, 2000 and 2001 - followed by the same vintages of Vieux Télégraphe. It
was stunning then, and on this tasting it remains so. It has only a moderately
deep, gently maturing colour. The nose does have some baked fruit elements to
it, which I commented on when I last tasted this wine, but unlike some other
wines in this tasting it is not the predominant feature. There is a twiggy,
Grenache-fruit element to it, as well as roasted meats, and exotic notes of
cloves and curry spices. The palate carries richness, but it also carries
excellent acidity, and a slightly more backward feel than many of its peers. It
has a lovely broad presence in the mouth though, and although it shows tannic
grip and definition it also has a complete although very masculine feel to it.
Delicious wine with fabulous potential for the future; I expect this will drink
well for well over a decade yet, if not for two. 19+/20
![]()
Home - Site index - Site updated July 25, 2008 - © The Winedoctor 2000 - 2008 - Wine Scores - RSS
