Home > Vintages and Regions > Loire > Focus on: Saumur
Focus on: Saumur
Hands in pockets, I sauntered along the Quai Mayaud towards the centre of town. On my right flowed the Loire, the muddy waters meandering lazily along between the river's ceaselessly shifting sandbanks, to be joined just downstream by those of the Thouet, yet another tributary emptying into Europe's greatest untamed river. High on the hill to my left, behind the rooftops, the famous chateau, keeping its eternal watch over the town. Behind me was my hotel, which I had just left; the Anne d'Anjou certainly wasn't the cheapest roof-over-my-head I could have chosen, but despite my dwindling finances - in fact, make that non-existent finances, as the bank balance was permanently negative in those heady student days - I figured I deserved a treat. Later on, I would be dining in the hotel's restaurant Les Ménestrels, an evening where I would single-handedly bring down the average age of the clientele by at least 20 years. Surrounded by seemingly wealthy late-middle-aged couples of British origin, I found myself viewed with suspicion. "I suspect he's a journalist", I heard one lady whisper, the final word layered with obvious disdain. Fortunately, the dining experience rose above the frostiness of my neighbours; it would a great meal.
As I continued my stroll into the town I discovered, upon turning a corner, a Maison du Vin, the display window festooned with bottles. Taking a perch at the tasting bar inside I chose a few wines to taste, names largely unfamiliar to me. The experience was thrilling; bright and vibrant raspberry fruit exploded on my palate. My tasting vocabulary at the time was poor, but looking back (yes, through rose-tinted spectacles I admit) the wines had vivacity and freshness, elegance rather than deep substance, and were endowed with deliciously crisp acidity. This was something new!
It was the summer of 1993, and I had just discovered Saumur.
Saumur: the Town and Chateau
Perhaps surprisingly that was the only time I have stayed within Saumur itself; although I have returned many times I have always laid my head outside of the city, either camping upriver at L'Etang de la Brèche, or in rented properties in the countryside to the north, amongst the orchards, vistas of sunflowers and the regimented rows of trees that characterise small-scale French forestry. Approaching Saumur from this direction always used to confuse me; whichever of the two almost-parallel routes you take into Saumur you will find yourself seemingly passing over two rivers before reaching the town proper. This illusion is caused by the Ile d'Offard, a large built-up island lying within the centre of the Loire. Having crossed the first bridge it is tempting to think that the Loire is behind you, but in fact you are only halfway across.

As you cross the second and rather wider channel of water you cannot fail to notice the aforementioned chateau, a 10th-century edifice built, like most of the town, from tuffeau, the soft, pale and elegant limestone that characterises this section of the Loire. Towering fortress-like over Saumur this impressive stronghold has, like many of France's best-known ancient monuments, seen a remarkable amount of destruction and restoration over the years. Rebuilt following damage in the 12th century, it has housed a military barracks, a Napoleonic prison and, more recently, a museum and restaurant. Although certainly not the prettiest of all the Loire's chateaux, nor the most extravagant (there are no Da Vinci double-helix staircases here, and it is well short of Chambord's reputed 365 chimneys) it is certainly worth a visit. Shown above is a view of the southern arm of the Loire and the Ile d'Offard, taken when standing alongside the chateau; it is a scan of a photographic print taken in 1993, included as an homage to that early journey of discovery, hence its rather hazy quality.
Other attractions in the town also reflect a military heritage; Saumur is home to the Cadre Noir, France's military equine academy, and a tank museum also appeals to some. The best day to visit is perhaps Saturday - the market, although officially located in the Place St-Pierre, snakes its way through the back streets of the town, inviting exploration. There are some good restaurants to be found, and if you know the right bar to go to you could soon find yourself chewing the cud with the best-known local vignerons.
The Wines of Saumur
Saumur provides us with a microcosm of the Loire, a feast of styles, sparkling and still, red and white, dry or occasionally sweet. Perhaps surprisingly, after that 1993 discovery, it took me a long time to really appreciate the quality offered by some of these appellations. I was suckered in by the apparently greater glory of Vouvray and Chinon, and for a while Saumur received little attention. But with time I came to realise that Saumur, and in particular Saumur-Champigny, gives us some of the greatest wines of the entire Loire vineyard.
The Saumur vineyards sit in a crescent to the south of the town, and within this arc lie those of the Saumur-Champigny appellation, the latter of which is the major focus of this missive and tasting. Both the Saumur and Saumur-Champigny appellations were created in 1957; there are just eight communes qualifying for the latter, all closely concentrated to the southeast of Saumur itself. The appellation permits only red wines from Cabernet Franc, Cabernet Sauvignon and Pineau d'Aunis, although many are pulling up this latter variety, also known as Chenin Noir, in favour of the two Cabernets. Yields are pretty high at an average of 77 hl/ha across the appellation over a ten year period, but producers with a mind to quality will harvest at significantly less than this. Nevertheless, the figures suggest some producers focus on quantity, not quality.
The appellation owes its existence largely to two characters, the first being Antoine Cristal who acquired, using wealth built up in the textile trade, the Château de Parnay near Saumur. He turned his attention to viticulture and winemaking, establishing one of the world's most remarkable vineyards, the Clos Cristal; a unique site, the vineyard is characterised by three kilometres of walls running east-west through the vineyard. On the north side are planted the vines, which grow up the walls a variable distance before being trained through holes to the south side. On this side, facing the sun, the vines erupt into foliage, benefiting not only from excellent exposure but also from the warmth of the wall, which absorbs the energy of the sun's rays during the day, slowly releasing its heat during the evening and night.

Within a few decades the wines of Père Cristal, as he became known, were to be found on the lists of the greatest French restaurants, and found favour both with the British regent Edward VII and the French war-time leader Georges Clemenceau. On the whole, though, the region was dominated by white wines, red vines being almost unknown within the commune. Today red dominates (in Saumur-Champigny exclusively so), although there are some who might wish for the pendulum to swing back a little, as it is increasingly realised how favourable some of the Saumur terroirs are for white varieties. This conversion to a predominantly red wine commune began with Père Cristal, whose vineyard is today in the ownership of the Hospices de Saumur.
Next up for Saumur was Paul Filliatreau, who in the 1970s was largely responsible for the creation of modern Saumur-Champigny. He spearheaded a move to a more vibrant style, vinified in steel rather than old wood, bottled for freshness and vivacious drinkability, his creation was clearly a direct ancestor of the wines I first tasted in 1993. The clean, mineral, stony-perfumed reds received a rapacious welcome in the wine bars of Paris, and soon all of Filliatreau's contemporaries with any business-sense were emulating his style. Today the pendulum has swung back from this quaffing style, however, and Saumur-Champigny is just as likely to be a serious, structured, ageworthy red wine of great substance and elegance. Oak has returned (although it is most successful where its use is restrained in my opinion) and many leading estates now produce a range of cuvées, moving from the easy-drinking wines from lesser sites and younger vines, through to very serious wines that demand time in the cellar. Cuvées such as Le Bourg (Clos Rougeard), Lisagathe (Chateau du Hureau), Les Loups (Domaine de Nerleux) and La Marginale (Roches Neuves) all fit comfortably within this latter category.
Saumur: Also White, Sparkling and Sweet
These other appellations also deserve some attention, although they are not strongly featured in the tasting written up below. Straight Saumur can be red or white, with 31 communes eligible for the former and 39 for the latter. The red wines are produced from the same varieties as Champigny, and the whites must be at least 80% Chenin Blanc, the balance Chardonnay or Sauvignon Blanc. Although some of these reds can without doubt be delicious, it is probably the whites that provide most interest, as in the hands of a committed vigneron the Saumur terroirs can yield a Chenin just as worthy as once from Vouvray or Savennières.
A recently confirmed addition to the Saumur pantheon is Saumur Le Puy Notre Dame, a new appellation laid out in 2006 but only officially signed off in late 2009. There are 17 eligible communes, and like Saumur-Champigny the wines here will be red only, harvested at a lower yield than the surrounding Saumur vineyards. The first vintage will be 2009, and time will tell whether this appellation enjoys the same success as Saumur-Champigny. Reading the words of those vignerons who will be working within the appellation, they seem to be on course to do so.

That leaves us with two final components of the Saumur genetic code, Saumur Mousseux and Coteaux de Saumur. The former really deserves a dedicated piece, this being a huge and successful industry for the region. The major houses are largely based in St-Hilaire-St-Florent, just downstream of Saumur, whilst the vineyards cover not only the tuffeau vineyards around Saumur, but stretch west onto the schistous land around Angers, and there are even a few vineyards on the far side of the river. These cover 95 communes in all, with about 1400 hectares under production. Permitted white grape varieties include Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc (together these two must not comprise more than 20% of the blend) and Chenin Blanc (also sometimes referred to as Pineau de la Loire), permitted red varieties include Cabernets Franc & Sauvignon, Cot (the local name for Malbec), Gamay, Pinot Noir and Pineau d'Aunis; the red varieties must not exceed 60% of the blend. The appellation also allows for rosé, and as a point of interest these must be produced solely from the red grapes listed above.
Coteaux de Saumur, meanwhile, allows for the production of sweet wines around the town; delimited in 1962, the appellation refers to 31 communes which largely overlap the rest of the Saumur appellation. The wines tend to have a charming, tender style and have a certain academic appeal, rather than the more luscious style of Anjou, or the more majestic character found in Vouvray.
The tasting described below focused on the wines of Saumur-Champigny, with one sparkling and one white Saumur to open the show. The line-up also originally included a bottle of René Legrand's Saumur-Champigny La Chaintrée 2005 which sadly was corked. No back up was available. (12/1/10)
Focus on: Saumur - Tasting Notes
These wines were tasted in January 2010. Click
to locate stockists.
Bouvet-Ladubay Mlle Ladubay Saumur Brut 2005: This wine still shows a
plentiful bead, a crisply coloured wine, perhaps with a tinge
of green? A very low-level cuvée intended for French supermarket shelves, the
Mlle Ladubay Brut has always over-performed in this vintage; this is the last of
many bottles I bought. Although delightful, however, they have rarely shown the exuberant, peachy fruit that they
did in the summer of 2008, but in their favour they have never lost their firm
minerality, crisp character and freshness of style. This is true of the palate,
although there is texture here too, a little creaminess coming in alongside the
mousse. Fresh, flavoury, a touch savoury, and drily pleasing. A good
introduction to the tasting. 17+/20
![]()
Domaine de Nerleux Saumur Blanc 2006: A pale to mid-gold colour. The nose starts off
with some classical papery Chenin aromas, before moving into a more
concentrated, dried, golden-fruit character. On the palate, after several hours
of air, it shows some good richness and depth, but with firm structure, almost
tannic backbone, plenty of spice and pepper through the middle and finish, and a
warming length. A good wine which takes a little while to get going - a good
example of an inexpensive wine which undeniably benefits from decanting.
16.5/20
![]()
Clos Rougeard Saumur Blanc Brézé 2005: A fairly rich hue, with a tinge of gold.
The nose is impressive, with a seam of dried fruit, autumnal but also vibrant
and firm, with notes of fennel too. Some of this may be related to the oak which
is still apparent on the nose, tight and grainy, just a little honeyed. The
palate has a firm and polished substance, but with very solid and upright
character, and piles of grip and drying tannin. This is a wine for the future I
think; although fascinating to taste now it is without doubt one that will
improve and integrate over the coming years; just how long is difficult to
predict, but I would try at least five years. Great wine, which is gently reminiscent of
white Hermitage as much as Saumur! 17.5-18+/20
![]()
Domaine de Nerleux Saumur-Champigny Clos des Châtains Vieilles Vignes 2006: A
very dark hue, concentrated and slightly glossy, with plenty of colour right
out to the rim. It starts out with a little green peppercorn on the nose, but this soon
disappears behind a layer of fruit, red and dark alongside one another, all very
fresh. Black cherry, plum skin, cherry stone, crunchy black berry fruit, along
with nuances of soot, charcoal and pepper. There follows a lovely texture on entry, with a
little richness but certainly not fat, savoury and sappy alongside the firm,
slightly stony fruit. Dry, reserved, a little tannic, lovely food wine, overall
delicious. Drink now with a decant, or keep. 17+/20
![]()
Chateau de Villeneuve Saumur-Champigny 2005: This wine, from the
immensely talented Jean-Pierre Chevallier, has an intense, dark, red-black hue
in the glass. This is followed by a simply beautiful nose, full of
black cherry, with that delightful plum skin and cherry-stone character that
typifies the best of these wines in their youth. It is slightly high-toned, slightly volatile
but is certainly very aromatic, with notes of cinnamon, clove, oranges and
charred fruit alongside the plum and cherry. It all promises plenty of appeal and potential.
The palate is finely delineated, fresh and stony, ripe and mouth-puckering at the same time with
beautifully defined fruit flavours. This is a vibrant and delicious wine, and
although perfect for drinking now I am sure
this would do well in the cellar for ten years or maybe even more. 17+/20
![]()
Chateau du Hureau Saumur-Champigny 2005: This is the entry-level wine
from the Vatan family in this most excellent of vintages, and it has a good, rich
and dark colour which betrays the warmth of the year. The nose carries
plenty of fresh interest, starting off with a melange of raspberry and
blackberry whish is later augmented with elements of smoke, tomato, charcoal and
blackcurrant. The palate is full and yet fresh, with notes of roasted, sun-baked
herbs alongside savoury sun-dried tomato and black raspberry. This certainly has
a good and distinctive style, and interesting fruit complexity. The finish is
sappy, toothsome and shows some nice, tannic extract. Overall this is a good but very fresh and lively,
rather punchy style. 17/20
![]()
Chateau de Chaintres Saumur-Champigny 2005: A great, vibrant colour here, and
a very fine and typical nose, full of plum skin, cherry stone, charcoal and
more. There are complex herbal notes here, rich bay leaf and rosemary, but
crucially there
is no greenness with it. Why some people think the apogee of the Loire Valley's red
wines
is rampant herbaceousness and not wonderful characteristics like these is beyond me. The
palate is lovely; stony, with plums squashed over rocks, a hard texture and bright
substance. It culminates in a great and grippy finish, touched by sooty tannin. A lovely wine which
will do well in the cellar I am sure. 17+/20
![]()
Chateau Yvonne Saumur-Champigny 2005: A very dark, opaque wine. The nose is
certainly not what I expected; there is plenty of new oak here, all honey and
toast, rather bluntly laid over the fruit. This latter element has an appealing
blackberry character, nuanced with elements of smoke and charcoal (perhaps more
oak-derived characteristics, admittedly) and a very sweetly ripe character. It
all seems a touch overdone, rather like a young Spanish or Australian wine, ripe
and heavily oaked. With some time in the glass admittedly this does all settle
down, and there are some more savoury, meaty notes, although that oak never
really disappears. The palate is as you might expect from the nose; rather
rounded, textured, with lots of substance, with a polished, chunky, sweet
pastille fruit. There is even a little hint of volatility at the periphery.
Altogether, right now this wine seems very atypical and over-oaked, with a
slightly bitter, wood-infused finish, but with several years bottle-age it may
come good - there is certainly enough fruit and substance to absorb this oak.
But classic, crisp, fresh and delineated Saumur-Champigny it ain't. A difficult
one to call. 16.5-17.5+?/20
![]()
Domaine de la Guilloterie Saumur-Champigny Cuvée des Loges 2005: A very
dark colour on my inspection of this wine from this domaine with which I am
largely unfamiliar. The nose is fascinating, starting off with a wealth
of vegetal, tomato-leaf characteristics, none of which inspires confidence, but
with some time in the glass this wine displays much more interesting and richer
tones. There are some dark and smoky berry fruits, redcurrants, savoury liquorice and roasted
meats. Alongside this though, there is still a delicious crunchiness to the fruit. The palate
is rich and creamy on entry, full and sappy, structured, savoury and meaty but
also with a bright and lively seam of acid and grip. This is just
lovely on the palate, with a creamy yet savoury finish; great fun and delicious
to drink. Lovely, silky texture, just very slightly plump, but grippy and well
defined. An impressive wine. 17+/20
![]()
Chateau Yvonne Saumur-Champigny 2004: A very dark hue here, and a
little muddy in appearance too, due to a very light and fine sediment suspended
in the wine. The nose offers the full panoply of ripeness, from dark and smoky
berry fruits with traces of black olives, minerals and flower petals, through to
fleeting notes of green peppercorn and a rich, roasted herb nuance. The palate
carries some weight and substance, with a sense of brooding muscle, and there is
certainly no suggestion of excess flesh or flabbiness here. There is dark fruit,
with seams of charcoal perhaps from oak, plentiful acidity and overall a rather
powerful, tannic presence. This culminates in a rather tannin-bound and grippy
finish. This isn't a wine to please those looking for a bright and breezy
Saumur-Champigny, but if planning for the long haul this rather claretty style
will do very nicely indeed. Perfect with roast beef too, I suspect. 17+/20
![]()
Clos Rougeard Saumur-Champigny Les Poyeux 2003: A good deep colour in the
decanter and glass, and a truly enticing nose, redolent of smoke, minerals,
graphite, cedar, resinous tree bark and more; what an absolute thrill! The
palate starts off with crunchy redcurrants and blackcurrants, with smoke and
tannin coming in through the midpalate, alongside a very well judged,
creamy-silky texture. This builds through the palate to the finish, where the
precise grip sits as one with a taut, leafy note of green peppercorn. Fresh,
elegant, lightly creamed, with a beautifully savoury finish, like high quality
dark chocolate swirled with cranberries, mouth-watering and substantial, this is
an amazing wine. So long too. I can see why some reject Clos Rougeard as being
atypical of Saumur-Champigny, and they have a very strong position. But what a
wine! I think it just the ticket. 18+/20
![]()
Clos Rougeard Saumur-Champigny Le Bourg 2003: It is more than a year
since I last tried a bottle of this (fear not, I have more in the cellar), and it
has moved on a little since that most recent tasting. There is certainly no
muddiness here, although it has a deep and maturing hue. On the nose it now
displays a very gamey character, roast pigeon perhaps, with a green and stony
element alongside; not tobacco and mint, although there are nuances of both,
today there is a more prominent feral, bilious, animally character. I have to
confess I find it hugely appealing! As I noted previously, the palate provides a
union of silky texture and power, a seamless composition, with a firm but
elegantly poised structure of tannins and acidity beneath. What a hugely
impressive composition this is; there is richness and yet tautness, graininess
and softness all blended together, none too domineering, none subsumed by any
other. Great wine. For drinking now, Les Poyeux is preferable I am sure, but
this still has much to give for the future and in the long run it will be the
greater wine. 18.5-19+/20
![]()
Chateau de Chaintres Saumur-Champigny 2002: Rather reticent on the nose at
first, and coming straight after the corked wine from René Legrand I must
confess I was a little concerned. I needn't have worried, as within an hour or so
this wine really came around. The appearance is in keeping with the wine's age,
a dusty cherry red with a pink, oxblood rim. A lovely, refined and elegant nose,
with ripe but heady and perfumed fruit, with a rich, macerated feel alongside a
fine and crunchy freshness, also with notes of green peppercorn and tobacco. A
good presence on the palate, cool and slightly detached, but with flesh and nice
grip, with a flourish of ripe tannins coming through at the finish. Slightly
autumnal edges to the fruit, but I like the soft, cottony, not-quite-silky
texture, and there is plenty of substance and grip here. In fact the weight and
tannic backbone suggest that this could go for another 3-4 years before we see
it at its best. Impressive. 17+/20
![]()
