Home > Vintages and Regions > Bordeaux > Bordeaux 2005 > En primeur, April 2006
Bordeaux 2005: En primeur, April 2006
Bordeaux 2005
En primeur
First taste, April 2006
At Two Years:
With the passing of the sixth (or fifth, depending on whether you include 2000) vintage of the 21st Century, one has to feel just a little sorry for the Bordelais. Things got off to a prestigious start with the 2000 vintage. Clearly this was the Vintage of the Century; we could debate which century, but the fact remains that this was a highly regarded vintage, with many successful wines from all appellations. But then came 2003, and it was obvious that this was actually the Vintage of the Century, even though only a tiny number of chateaux turned out the most breath-taking wines, whilst the rest foundered somewhat.
So one has to feel for the Bordelais when they find themselves presented with the 2005 vintage. Obviously this can't be the Vintage of the Century, because we have already had that twice over in the previous five years, so what are they to do? How can they, and the merchants that peddle their wines, convey the apparent quality to us, the lowly consumer. A new descriptive term is required.
2005 is the Vintage of a Lifetime!
Well, maybe. Sarcasm aside, it was clear as early as October 2005 - harvest time - that this was going to turn out to be a very special vintage. My vintage review gives some details of the conditions that contributed to this most successful of recent vintages, but presented below are my very first tasting notes, my first chance to assess the wines for myself. These wines were presented by Bibendum at their first ever Bordeaux en primeur tasting, in what will hopefully be a regular feature in the annual tasting calendar. They form a representative sample of the vintage, certainly sufficient to generalise about vintage quality, as well as giving more detailed information about the individual wines. I found quality to be high across the board; a few wines were simply fabulous, extraordinarily impressive considering their youth. Only a handful of wines disappointed; in each case, the wine had been overworked and forced. A wall of hard tannins, overwhelming the presence of fruit throughout the palate, rather than peeking in at the end as was the case with the better wines, is a sure sign of over-extraction. As always seems to be the case (although why this is I don't know) the right bank properties tended towards this style more than those on the left bank. (4/5/06)
Bordeaux 2005 - Tasting Notes
The following wines were tasted in April 2006. I have categorised the wines
according to commune, and have included details of encépagement where
available. Scores are presented as a range, rather than my usual single number,
reflecting the unfinished nature of the wines; some had not finished malolactic
fermentation, and some will undoubtedly put on a little weight in barrel. Click
to locate
stockists:
St Estèphe
Chateau Lafon-Rochet 2005: A vibrant red-purple hue with, with a blue
rim. There is a lot of toffee-oak on the nose here, with sweet, rather damsony
fruit, and yet it maintains an appealing freshness. Full and grippy palate,
showing plenty of ripe and rather soft tannin, although all smothered in jammy
damsons. Not the finest example of Lafon Rochet, but close in quality to the
2003. Good 16-17/20
![]()
Pauillac
Chateau Haut-Bages-Libéral 2005:
CF 72%, M 28%. A good colour. Very expressive nose, showing notes of raspberry
and tar, with a floral edge. There is character and interest here. Soft, sweet,
creamy toffee ice cream here. Good weight. Rather a ripe, caressing style on the
palate, with supple tannins and fine acidity. This wine is certainly hanging
together very nicely. Easily the best of the few HBL vintages I have tasted,
this is an excellent effort that could provide some very good value.
16.5-17.5/20
![]()
Chateau Pontet-Canet 2005: CS 70%, M 25%, CF 4%, PV 1%. This has a
lovely, dense colour. The nose is perfumed with aromatic floral and mineral
character. A middleweight on the palate, showing good structure; there are ripe
tannins in abundance, and a full character. This very well made wine does seem a
little straightforward and foursquare at present, but it has fine structure and
great potential for the cellar. The aromatic complexity on the nose is
encouraging. Very good indeed. 16.5-17.5/20
![]()
Chateau Pichon-Baron 2005: CS 65%, M 30%, CF 5%. A fine colour, rather
vibrant and appealing. Classic dark fruit nose, with bramble notes, quite
expressive when worked hard in the glass but otherwise this is giving little
away today. Balanced and elegant, with ripe, polished fruit over a fine
structure of ripe tannins. There are hidden complexities here, which will be
more readily revealed with time. I think this could be very good indeed, but it
needs time. 17-18/20
![]()
St Julien
Chateau Branaire-Ducru 2005:
This doesn't quite have the depth of
intensity of colour that many other wines of this vintage demonstrate, although
it is quite vibrant in the glass. Certainly it has plenty of appeal on the nose,
with an aromatic, peppery, nutty, violet-tinged raspberry and blackberry fruit
profile. This leads onto a palate that is elegant and balanced, infused with
minerals and full of character. Behind it there is a very firm tannic backbone -
which I missed on first tasting, the aromatics and fruit are so startling -
pervading through to the finish. Needs to put on a little weight en barrique.
Good length. This has an unusual character, paradoxically light and yet
powerful, but should be fine, and is certainly a top effort from proprietor
Patrick Maroteaux. 17-18/20
![]()
Chateau Gruaud-Larose 2005: CS 60%, M 30%, CF 5.5%, PV 3%, Malbec
1.5%. Nice colour, not the depth that some others exhibit, with a good
purple-blue rim. Rather restrained nose, showing some good black fruits.
Middleweight palate, rather typical of Gruaud, chunky and bordering on
foursquare. The tannins appear on the back of the palate, and there is correct
acidity. Everything is in place, but there is no flair or passion here.
Nevertheless, a nicely assembled wine. 16-17/20
![]()
Chateau Langoa-Barton 2005: A deeply coloured wine, although with a
bright crimson hue when it catches the light, and a vibrant pink rim. The nose
is very expressive, with some vibrant fruit immediately apparent. Sweet fruit on
the palate, carrying a lovely structure of ripe tannins, supple and attractive,
but not too creamy or overblown. This is quite fine, a wine exhibiting real
class and super St Julien style today. Certainly trumps its Léoville sibling on
the day. Super potential here, easily superior to the 1985, my favourite vintage
of Langoa (until now I think). 18-19/20
![]()
Chateau Léoville-Barton 2005: CS 75%, M 20%, CF 5%. A very, very
densely coloured wine, with a vibrant pink rim. Dense and complex nose, and yet
restrained, showing only some pickling spices and beetroot aromas. Supple fruit
on the palate, sitting quite distant from the firm, backward tannic structure.
The acidity is correct. At present this is a monolithic collection of wine
components in a glass, showing little finesse or appeal, but I think it is a
wine with a great future. May well warrant a score beyond the range I have
predicted today. 17-18+/20
Margaux
Chateau Cantenac-Brown 2005: Never the most profound wine, the AXA
team at Cantenac Brown have done a good job here. A very deep colour. Nutty,
spicy black fruit nose. Straight down the line, classic style here. No frills or
fanciness. Nice extract apparent on entry, moderately appealing texture, supple
and ripe tannins. Nicely balanced presence on the palate. Soft, welcoming rather
polished appeal. Might be a classic, good value short term drink at the right
price. 16-17/20
![]()
Chateau Ferrière 2005: A vibrant hue, moderately dense, with a
shocking pink-purple rim. Appealing on the nose, showing some concentrated,
nutty black fruits, with nuances of blackberry crumble. Elegant entry, rather
restrained midpalate, showing a lovely character. Lots of floral Margaux
character here, and a fine acid structure. This has plenty of potential. The
only downside is a leanness through the midpalate, although this may gain weight
en barrique. 16.5-17.5/20
![]()
Chateau Giscours 2005: CS 62%, M 38%. A very deep colour here,
leading out to a purple-black rim. Dense and concentrated nose, very evocative,
with aromas of black fruits, white flower petals, tar and minerals. Very pure.
Full, glorious palate, very complete, with a slightly soft texture. Ripe, full,
firm tannins, with plenty of fat and fresh acidity. There is evident structure
here, but the palate is also packed with flavour, whilst remaining
quintessentially Margaux. Excellent. 17-18/20
![]()
Chateau Rauzan-Ségla 2005: A deep colour, although not so deep as to
be opaque. Sweet, slightly confected nose, showing ripe fruit with little floral
and mineral elements. Quite nicely balanced on the palate, ripe and a little
creamy, with good rather prominent acidity and gentle, supple tannins. This
offers an intriguing melange of ripeness and almost creamy opulence, alongside a
nice minerality and floral freshness rather typical of Margaux. My only concern
is that this impressive palate dies away very quickly on the finish. More
persistence and I would be more impressed, but this certainly has potential.
16-17/20
![]()
Chateau du Tertre 2005: CS 40%, M 30%, CF 25%, PV 5%. A good, dense
colour. Woodspice nose, with blackberry crumble fruit and some unresolved oak at
present. Finely balanced on the palate, but showing a sweet, creamy, plump
texture. A fine presence of supple tannins underpins the palate, which is
rounded out with a sweet caramel finish. A rich style, acidity correct, just
peeking out from beneath the fruit. Exuberant but fresh and well poised. Nice
length. Very good indeed. 16.5-17.5/20
![]()
Haut-Médoc
Chateau Cantemerle 2005: CS 50%, M 40%, CF 5%, PV 5%. This wine has a
vibrant hue, although there isn't the intensity displayed by many of the other
wines. There is a spicy, meaty nose, showing attractive black fruits with a
fresh, lifted style. Rather gentle on the palate, rounded, soft and
approachable. This doesn't have the complex interest to be found elsewhere, and
it has less depth than I would like. It's also a little short. But it will make
very acceptable short-term drinking one day. 15-16/20
Chateau Camensac 2005: A dense colour, but very bright, with a
blue-purple rim. Ripe fruit on the nose, notes of cherries and blackberries.
Gentle attack on the palate. Seems a touch lean, lacking in the weight or
substance of some other wines. Good grippy tannins though, melded with some
sweet fruit on the finish. Good. 15.5-16.5/20
![]()
Chateau Sociando-Mallet 2005: CS 55%, M 40%, CF 5%. Dark, moderately
intense wine, with a blue-purple rim. Attractive presence of dark fruits on the
nose, with good depth and interest. Very soft and textured on the palate, and
nicely ripe. Clearly delineated fruit, very well proportioned wine. Firm
structure, balanced, and a grippy finish. This is very good wine, with more
potential than you might expect. 16.5-17.5/20
![]()
Chateau La Tour Carnet 2005: CS 52%, M 48%. A very dark hue. The nose
has a plethora of rip black fruits, and there is good character on the palate.
Supple but fairly forceful tannins, firm acidity, with a good presence of soft
and rounded fruit. Decent weight. At the right price, this could provide some
good value drinking. 16-17/20
![]()
Moulis & Listrac
Chateau Chasse-Spleen 2005: A moderate depth of colour. Sweet and
creamy, very primary fruit on entry, rich and expressive, with a seam of buttery
crumble for good measure. Nevertheless a rather simple and straightforward
palate, although it presents an appealing texture, nice extract and a ripe,
charcoal-edged structure. All the necessary components are here, nicely
balanced. Good potential. 16-17/20
![]()
Pessac-Léognan
Chateau Smith-Haut-Lafitte Blanc 2005: Lots of zippy and exuberant on
the nose here, really quite exotic in character, but with a lime-like freshness.
Lovely fruit profile to match on the palate, a ripe tropical fruit salad. But it
has great acidity too, fresh and balanced. There is a sharp note on the back of
the palate, but overall this has fine character. Very good indeed. 16.5-17.5/20
![]()
Chateau Smith-Haut-Lafitte 2005: A moderate depth of colour, but a
very expressive nose here, which displays complex, meaty, blackberry fruit. Good
texture and weight on the palate, carrying a lovely depth of cherry and berry
fruit. Fine, quite firm, not over-extracted tannins, although there is quite a
flourish of them on the finish. An appealing, silky quality here. This has real
depth, and is a real success for this perhaps underrated property. 17-18/20
![]()
Chateau Haut-Bailly 2005: CS 56%, M 38%, CF 6%. A good depth of colour
on inspection, quite concentrated out to the rim. The nose is simply divine,
displaying great refinement, with cashew nut black fruits and a mineral
freshness. And the palate doesn't disappoint; gentle texture, perfectly
balanced, carrying a seam of as yet unintegrated tannins and firm, youthful
acidity. Beautiful purity, rounded, well polished and elegant wine. Wonderful.
18-19/20
![]()
Chateau Pape-Clément 2005: CS 45%, M 55%. A really dense colour here,
outclassing just about every other wine here. A lovely, lifted, red fruit nose.
Simply divine style here, with notes of white flower petals too. This presents a
caressing, rounded texture on the palate, but with an elegant style. Rather a
masculine feel to the tannins, which are ripe but very firm and solid. This is
very well structured, not over-extracted, complex and very fine. Lovely finish.
This has just bags of potential. 18-19/20
![]()
St Emilion
Chateau Canon-La-Gaffelière 2005: M 55%, CF 35%, CS 10%. Lots of
colour again here. Good fruit on the nose, with quite charismatic spicy Dundee
cake Merlot character. Very full and creamy on entry, impressive, yet quite fine
and balanced. The palate has a silky-supple presence, around a core of ripe,
polished tannin. This rounded and complete wine has undeniable style. Excellent.
17.5-18.5/20
![]()
Chateau Larcis Ducasse 2005: A property next door to Pavie, run by
Stéphane Derenoncourt and Nicolas Thienpont since 2002. M 80%, CF 15%, CS 5%.
An incredibly dense and opaque wine. The nose has appeal, still showing rather
obvious toffee-caramel-vanilla ice cream character from the oak, with blueberry
fruit. On the palate the wine is lighter than might be expected, and seems
rather out of kilter if not disjointed. There is lovely ripeness and texture,
but it is on the edge of tinny over-extraction. It will appeal to many, but not
to me. More freshness, vibrancy and elegance, please. 15.5-16.5/20
![]()
Chateau Pavie-Macquin 2005: M 75%, CF 25%, CS 5%. Another wine with a
remarkable dense colour. Rather an appealing nose, showing some plummy Merlot
fruit with traces of woodspices and sandalwood. Plump, rounded palate, carrying
a pile of extract and a firm, rather hard style of tannin. The acidity is also
rather lacking. Pushed just a little too far I think; again, this wine teeters
on the brink of over-extraction. It will, however, appeal to many. 14.5-15.5/20
![]()
Chateau Fombrauge 2005: M 77%, CF 14%, CS 9%. A dense, purple-black
wine. A paradox on the nose, a mix of sweet and sharp, like cranberry juice.
Rather a middleweight on the palate, with a lovely texture, but with massive
tannins which override all other characteristics. Decent acidity, but rather too
over-extracted for my taste. 14.5-15.5/20
![]()
Pomerol
Chateau Gazin 2005: A densely coloured wine, with a raspberry-blue
periphery. Restrained fruit on the nose, but there is no lack of style here.
Notes of pepper. The palate has a lovely, soft and supple entry, leading to a
well balanced midpalate. Gently creamy, but firmly structured without
over-extraction, with a pile of tannin through the midpalate and finish. This
has very good potential. 17-18/20
![]()
Chateau Feytit-Clinet 2005: M 95%, CF 5%. A dense, glossy, deeply
coloured wine. Lots of ripe fruit here, finely polished blueberries with a sheen
of oak on the nose. Quite fine on the palate, but succulent and appealing. A
lovely fruit profile featuring fresh damsons. Showing an elegant texture through
the midpalate despite plenty of ripeness here. Subtle tannins. Impressive.
17-18/20
![]()
Chateau Petit Village 2005: A deeply coloured wine, and a rather
alcoholic, hot, porty nose to match. On the palate, highly extracted fruit and
rather domineering tannins. Out of balance in my opinion. Perhaps just
over-extracted. It does have some appeal though, but what the future holds I am
not sure. 15-16/20
![]()
Côtes de Castillon
Chateau d'Aiguilhe 2005: CS 80%, CF 20%. This property is owned by
Stephan von Neipperg of Canon la Gaffèliere. A deep, dense colour to this wine,
although it is quite bright and vibrant. Rather plush, plump nose, welcoming,
although there is a trace of rubber along with it. Rather brutal on the palate
though; this has been pushed too far. Grating and clearly over-extracted, the
palate dominated by a sledgehammer of hard tannins. No, thank you. 12.5-13.5/20
![]()
Sauternes
Chateau Sigalas-Rabaud 2005: Intense, floral, sweet, aromatic tropical
fruit nose. Notes of lanolin and vanilla. Very full on the palate, with an
earthy-mineral note which I have noticed in Sigalas Rabaud in previous vintages.
Good depth, with fine concentration and a massive, heady sweetness. Fresh
though. Good length. Very primary at present, simple and sweet, but this has
piles of potential. 17-18/20
![]()
Chateau Suduiraut 2005: Pale golden hue, with a green tinge. A divine
nose, steeped in honey and acacia, honeysuckle and chalky botrytis. Superb style
on the palate, firm botrytis character, but with a massive wall of sweetness.
Despite an acidity that is difficult to see, it seems fresh and balanced. This
just needs time to integrate and open out in a more coherent, less showy manner.
Excellent. 18-19/20
![]()
Home - Site index - Site updated September 07, 2008 - © The Winedoctor 2000 - 2008 - Wine Scores - RSS
